TeamingOutreach AI

For a $35M federal courthouse renovation shortlist with a 3-week proposal deadline and four partner firms to engage — a JV equity partner, an MEP specialty sub, a structural-steel sub, and a certified MBE/WBE sub for the DBE goal — TeamingOutreach AI writes a 3-email sequence per firm, each tuned to that firm's specific scope and the relationship warmth you flag (cold outreach vs. prior joint venture). The package includes a fit rationale per partner anchored to stated capabilities and past project history, A/B subject-line variants so the BD analyst can A/B test open rates, a Day-1 / Day-5 / Day-12 cadence calibrated to your deadline, and an engagement log that tracks the status (open / replied / declined / committed / declined-with-referral). When a partner returns a commitment, the cascade event fires a "confirmed" status signal to ProposalAssembly #21 so the proposal team can lock the teaming matrix without manual re-entry.

The agent expects seven blocks: (1) your firm name and the role you are playing on this pursuit (prime GC seeking MEP sub, design firm seeking CM partner, JV equity holdco seeking MBE partner for the DBE goal); (2) the target firms listed by name with relationship warmth and the type of firm needed (MEP, structural, civil, specialty sub, JV equity, MBE/WBE/DBE partner); (3) the project highlights — value, location, client, delivery method, key schedule milestones; (4) your value proposition as a teaming partner (prior joint ventures, payment terms, BIM or preconstruction support, market access); (5) the scope of work you are asking each partner to fill; (6) certification constraints affecting selection (8(a), MBE, WBE, DBE goal percentages, security clearance requirements); and (7) the submission deadline plus any named known decision-makers you want the email addressed to. The cadence and tone of every email is calibrated from those seven inputs.

Day-1 / Day-5 / Day-12 is the standard 12-day sequence for SOQ shortlists where the decision window is roughly three weeks. The Day-1 email is the introduction — establishes the project pitch, the scope for the partner, and the reason for contact. Day-5 reframes the pitch with a different angle (project milestone, recent shared project, or relevant reference). Day-12 is the hard ask: explicit commitment-to-team request with the submission deadline and the next step (drafting meeting, NDA scope, JV term sheet). For shorter decision windows — say a 10-day shortlist interview cycle — collapse to Day-1 / Day-4 / Day-7 to keep two follow-ups inside the window. For longer SOQ pursuits with a 30-day window — federal courthouse or healthcare SOQ cycles — the Day-1 / Day-5 / Day-12 cadence adds a Day-21 reminder-with-time-pressure before the final Day-28 request. Each email carries its send-day label and purpose: introduction / value reinforcement / explicit ask / pre-deadline urgency.

Yes — the two agents are designed to chain. Run TeamingMatch AI on the same opportunity and you get a ranked shortlist scored on capability fit, current workload capacity, and competitive overlap. The top three ranked firms from a TeamingMatch run pass directly into TeamingOutreach AI as named input, with their scoring rationale and contact roles pre-filled — so instead of typing firm names and re-stating the project pitch, your BD analyst selects the candidates from the match output and runs TeamingOutreach on them in the same session. The round-trip path is: shortlist campaign → ranked candidates → per-candidate outreach sequence → partner-by-partner engagement log → ProposalAssembly #21 hand-off on commitment. This is the standard BD workflow for shortlist pursuits from a $35M federal courthouse to a $95M transit-rail CMAR prequalification when the partner slate needs to be locked in 10 business days.